I would like to share this with all the distinguished members and organisations 
in Jharkhand group. Accommodating extracting corporation through getting some 
doles and letter them extract the mines would remain a dangerous option as it 
would not be halting the expansion of mine bases ecologically hostile habitats.

Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam
For Centre for Ecological Audit ,Social Inclusion and Governance, Delhi


 


Expert
Group Meeting on Extractive Industries, Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Corporate
Social ...


Expert Group Meeting on Extractive Industries, Indigenous Peoples'
Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility: Letter to the Canadian Government


29 March 2009

Manila, Philippines
The Right Honourable Stephen Harper
Prime Minister of Canada
Office of the Prime Minister
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON Canada K1A 0A2

Dear Prime Minister Harper,

It is with
great regret that we, the undersigned participants of the International Expert
Workshop on Indigenous Peoples' Rights, Corporate Accountability and Extractive
Industries, and the International Conference on Extractive Industries and
Indigenous Peoples, note the adoption of the new Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) Strategy for the Canadian International Extractive Sector. It is a
strategy that falls far short of upholding Canada's international commitments on
human rights, Indigenous Peoples and the environment. By advising on existing
voluntary guidelines, instead of imposing binding, regulatory requirements, it
is one that will do little to stop abuses by Canadian extractive companies from
continuing unabated and unpunished.

Among the Indigenous Peoples present
at these two meetings - the first was organized by the Tebtebba Foundation and
the second by United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII) - are
those who earlier in the decade shared personal reports of abuse by Canadian
mining companies with the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs
and International Trade (SCFAIT). In 2005, as you know, that Committee responded
by calling on the Government of Canada to "establish clear legal norms . to
ensure that Canadian companies and residents are held accountable when there is
evidence of environmental and/or human rights violations associated with the
activities of Canadian mining companies."

In "Building the Canadian
Advantage" that recommendation has been ignored, as have the groundbreaking
consensus recommendations that resulted from the National CSR Roundtable
process. Together these recommendations represent the views of national
Parliamentarians, civil society, Indigenous Peoples, industry, labour, socially
responsible investors, academics and members of the Canadian public. Given this
breadth of support, it is disappointing that the Conservative Government of
Canada has chosen to so freely set aside the progressive outputs of democratic
and officially mandated dialogue.

Particularly alarming in the new CSR
Strategy is the absence of an independent and empowered ombudsperson to
investigate and respond to the concerns of affected communities, and the lack of
provisions for sanctions and withdrawal of public support when extractive
companies fail to comply with human rights and environmental standards.
Furthermore, an appointed CSR counselor, who requires the consent of the company
involved to undertake a review, and who may target his or her review at both
communities and their allies, offers no real recourse for communities that have
been adversely affected by Canadian extractive companies, and raises serious
questions about corporate co-optation of this instrument, as well as fears that
the review process may be used against Indigenous Peoples.

Over the
course of the last seven days, numerous participants at the International
Conference on Extractive Industries and Indigenous Peoples and the International
Expert Workshop on Indigenous Peoples' Rights, Corporate Accountability and
Extractive Industries have made it clear that the abuse of Indigenous Peoples'
rights to lands, territories and resources at the hands of Canadian extractive
companies is ongoing. This reality once again underscores the failure of
voluntary, industry-driven initiatives to protect human rights and reinforces
the need for extra-territorial regulation of extractive industries, especially
in the context of weak governance in host countries.

It is our position
that the "Canadian Advantage" has already been established in the global
extractive sector and it has been established at the expense of the environment
and of Indigenous Peoples. The advantage that has been lost is Canada's
reputation as a leader on human rights.

As these important meetings
draws to a close in Manila, we call on the Government of Canada to take
immediate steps to bring its CSR Strategy for the Canadian International
Extractive Sector into line with the recommendations of the SCFAIT Report and
the Report of the Advisory Group to the National Roundtables on CSR and the
Canadian Extractive Sector in Developing Countries.

It is also critical
that any effort by the Canadian government reflects respect for Canada's
obligations under such agreements as the Convention on the Elimination of Racial
Discrimination, as well as internationally recognized rights that have been
entrenched in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
(UNDRIP). As you are aware, UNDRIP was endorsed by the Canadian House of Commons
last year and in 2007 the Committee on the Elimination of Racial
Discrimination' s (CERD) concluding observations to Canada noted: "with concern
the reports of adverse effects of economic activities connected with the
exploitation of natural resources in countries outside Canada by transnational
corporations registered in Canada on the right to land, health, living
environment and the way of life of indigenous peoples living in these regions."
CERD concluded by recommending that Canada "explore ways to hold transnational
corporations registered in Canada accountable. "

Until such a time as
full regulatory measures governing Canadian extractive companies can be enacted,
we further encourage Canadian Parliamentarians, including members of the
Conservative Party of Canada, to consider passing the proposed Bill C-300, an
Act respecting Corporate Accountability for the Activities of Mining, Oil or Gas
in Developing Countries. Over the short-term this Act would effectively
supplement the Canadian CSR Strategy by requiring publicly-funded extractive
companies to uphold standards like the International Finance Corporation' s
Performance Standards on Social and Environmental Sustainability, with Ministers
empowered to review complaints and required to report back to Parliament.
Particularly welcome are the suggested amendments contained within Bill C-300,
which would lead to the withdrawal of support by Export Development Canada and
the cessation of investment by the Canadian Pension Plan where extractive
operations are inconsistent with the guidelines that are endorsed in section 5
of the Act.

Ultimately, we request that you reconsider your limited CSR
response and commit to measures that genuinely address the serious human rights
and environmental abuses associated with Canadian extractive industry 
companies..


For your information, we have attached the Manila Declaration, the
document that resulted from the International Conference on Extractive
Industries and Indigenous Peoples, and will forward the report of the Expert
Group Workshop when it is finalized.

We look forward to receiving your
reply and request that it be directed to the Secretariat for the UN Permanent
Forum on Indigenous Issues, so that they might in turn forward it to
participants of the Manila meetings..

Thank you for your consideration of
our concerns, which echo those raised by over 100 participants from 35
countries.

Institutional Signatories (as of 30 March 2009)
Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago
(Indonesia)
Cordillera Peoples Alliance (Philippines)
Kanak Agency for Development (New
Caledonia)
Centre for Environmental Research and
Development (Papua New Guinea)
Western Shoshone Defense Project (USA)
PIPLinks - Indigenous Peoples Links (UK)
Tebtebba Foundation (Indigenous Peoples'
International Centre for Policy Research and Education) (Philippines and UK)


Individual Signatories (as of 30 March 2009)
Mr. Brian Wyatt (Australia)
Ms. Urantsooj Gombosuren (Mongolia)
Mr. Cathal Doyle (Ireland)
Ms. Meaghen Simms (Canada)
Ms. Elisa Canqui Mollo (Bolivia)
Mr. Luis Vittor (Peru)


 
 

Reply via email to