Hi Henning. I don't know detail of C language... On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Henning Thielemann <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes - at least this is the expected semantics of the IO monad. > Unless someone has written a RULE that removes the duplicate peek. However, > I think this is generally not a good idea, since even regular memory can be > modified by a concurrent thread.
So clear. Thank's a lot. -- Kiwamu Okabe _______________________________________________ jhc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/jhc
