This means that you will mention it as a possible solution for integrating Maps in the jibx description?
fine I see two main benefits 1) it is a simple straightforward approach 2) it does no rely on a lower API, which is more under change But from my point of view Maps are so common, that a direct handling by jibx, would be a valuable extension. manfred > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag > von Dennis Sosnoski > Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. März 2006 12:56 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [jibx-users] support for Maps > > Hi Manfred, > > This sort of adapter approach is something I'd like to work into the > JiBX 2.0 binding handling. It's not as efficient as a customer > marshaller/unmarshaller, but much easier to write. > > - Dennis ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
