Yeh, it is a typo making this mistake. Nothing wrong with Jibx. Thank you.

Rice


On 4/30/06, Dennis Sosnoski < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just as an added note, I tried recreating the problem using:

  <structure name="wrapper">
    <structure field="name" usage="required" type="simple.Name"/>
  </structure>

where simple.Name has a <mapping> with extensions. Works fine for me, so
I suspect there's something else going on in your case.

  - Dennis

Dennis Sosnoski wrote:

> Hi Rice,
>
> I don't see anything wrong with this, offhand. The nested <structure>
> construct is kind of ugly from the code generation standpoint, but as
> far as I know should work. Can you add a bug report in Jira and supply
> the code to reproduce the problem?
>
>  - Dennis
>
> Rice Yeh wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>     I am mapping the XPDL 1.0 document, in which there is an element
>> DataField with the following xsd
>>             <xsd:element name="DataField">
>>             <xsd:complexType>
>>                 <xsd:sequence>
>>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:DataType"/>
>>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:InitialValue" minOccurs="0"/>
>>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:Length" minOccurs="0"/>
>>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:Description" minOccurs="0"/>
>>                     <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ExtendedAttributes"
>> minOccurs="0"/>
>>                 </xsd:sequence>
>>                 <xsd:attribute name="Id" type="xsd:NMTOKEN"
>> use="required"/>
>>                 <xsd:attribute name="Name" type="xsd:string"/>
>>                 <xsd:attribute name="IsArray" default="FALSE">
>>                     <xsd:simpleType>
>>                         <xsd:restriction base="xsd:NMTOKEN">
>>                             <xsd:enumeration value="TRUE"/>
>>                             <xsd:enumeration value="FALSE"/>
>>                         </xsd:restriction>
>>                     </xsd:simpleType>
>>                 </xsd:attribute>
>>             </xsd:complexType>
>>         </xsd:element>
>>                 <xsd:element name="DataType">
>>             <xsd:complexType>
>>                 <xsd:group ref="xpdl:DataTypes"/>
>>             </xsd:complexType>
>>         </xsd:element>
>>                 <xsd:group name="DataTypes">
>>             <xsd:choice>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:BasicType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:DeclaredType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:SchemaType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ExternalReference"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:RecordType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:UnionType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:EnumerationType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ArrayType"/>
>>                 <xsd:element ref="xpdl:ListType"/>
>>             </xsd:choice>
>>         </xsd:group>            The following are 2 example elements
>>             <DataField Id="Partial_Ship_Status" IsArray="FALSE">
>>             <DataType>
>>                 <DeclaredType Id="Business_Example_Typ2"/>
>>             </DataType>
>>             <InitialValue>OK</InitialValue>
>>             <Description>possible values are: "OK" and
>> "NOT_OK"</Description>
>>         </DataField>
>>         <DataField Id="No_Of_Stocked_Items" IsArray="FALSE">
>>             <DataType>
>>                 <BasicType Type="INTEGER"/>
>>             </DataType>
>>             <InitialValue>0</InitialValue>
>>             <Description>The number of the stocked items of the
>> product that customer ordered</Description>
>>         </DataField>
>>                     Here is my binding
>>             <mapping name="DataField"
>> class="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataField">
>>             <namespace uri=" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0"
>> default="elements" />
>>             <structure name="DataType">
>>                 <structure field="dataType" usage="required"
>>                 type="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType" />
>>             </structure>
>>             <value name="InitialValue" field="initialValue"
>> usage="optional" />
>>             <value name="Length" field="length" usage="optional" />
>>             <value name="Description" field="description"
>> usage="optional" />
>>             <collection name="ExtendedAttributes"
>> field="extendedAttributes"
>>                 usage="optional"
>> item-type="xs.workflow.xpdl10.ExtendedAttribute" />
>>             <value name="Id" field="id" usage="required"
>> style="attribute" />
>>             <value name="Name" field="name" usage="optional"
>> style="attribute" />
>>             <value name="IsArray" field="isArray" usage="optional"
>>                 style="attribute" />
>>         </mapping>
>>                 <mapping class="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType"
>> abstract="true">
>>             <namespace uri=" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0"
>> default="elements" />
>>         </mapping>
>>                 <mapping name="DeclaredType" class="
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.DeclaredType"
>>             extends="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType">
>>             <namespace uri=" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0 "
>> default="elements" />
>>             <value ident="ref" name="Id" field="id" usage="required"
>>                 style="attribute" />
>>         </mapping>
>>                 <mapping name="EnumerationType"
>> class="xs.workflow.xpdl10.EnumerationType "
>>             extends="xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataType">
>>             <namespace uri=" http://www.wfmc.org/2002/XPDL1.0"
>> default="elements" />
>>             <collection field="enumerationValueList">
>>                 <structure map-as="
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.EnumerationValue "></structure>
>>             </collection>
>>         </mapping>                    ....
>>                     , which has the structure (just with
>> field="dataType") nested in another structure (just with
>> name="DataField").
>>     I cannot find similar structure-nested-structure structure on
>> JiBX's help documents, but I cannot find other
>>     solution for xsd. I can successly compile the mapping but I have
>> a run time error seen below. The JiBX I use is
>>     version 1.0.1.
>>             as.util.ParseException: No unmarshaller defined for class
>> at index 17
>>         at
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer.transform(PackageTransformer.java:40)
>>
>>         at xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer
>> .<init>(PackageTransformer.java:30)
>>         at
>> xs.workflow.WorkflowBuilder.getPackage(WorkflowBuilder.java:66)
>>         at
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformerTest.testCase1(PackageTransformerTest.java:42)
>>
>>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown
>> Source)
>>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>         at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
>>         at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare (TestCase.java:127)
>>         at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect (TestResult.java:106)
>>         at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
>>         at junit.framework.TestResult.run (TestResult.java:109)
>>         at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
>>         at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
>>         at junit.framework.TestSuite.run (TestSuite.java:203)
>>         at
>> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java
>> :478)
>>         at
>> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run (RemoteTestRunner.java:344)
>>
>>         at
>> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
>>
>>     Caused by: org.jibx.runtime.JiBXException : No unmarshaller
>> defined for class at index 17
>>         at
>> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.getUnmarshaller(UnmarshallingContext.java:2425)
>>
>>         at
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_bindingDataType_access.unmarshal
>> ()
>>     at
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.DataField.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_2 (DataField.java)
>>
>>     at
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_bindingDataField_access.unmarshal
>> ()
>>     at
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_MungeAdapter.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_16 ()
>>
>>     at
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.Package.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_binding_unmarshal_1_0
>> (Package.java)
>>     at
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.JiBX_C__projects_XS_workflow_src_java_xs_workflow_xpdl10_bindingPackage_access.unmarshal ()
>>
>>     at
>> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalElement(UnmarshallingContext.java
>> :2569)
>>     at
>> org.jibx.runtime.impl.UnmarshallingContext.unmarshalDocument (UnmarshallingContext.java:2729)
>>
>>     at
>> xs.workflow.xpdl10.PackageTransformer.transform(PackageTransformer.java:37)
>>
>>     ... 18 more
>>
>>
>>     Any solution?
>>         Regards,
>> Rice
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users

Reply via email to