On 3/12/07, Jérôme BERNARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/12/07, Michael Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm using JiBX with maven2 and the maven2 plugin, but I can't get it > > to download the 1.1.3 stuff. > > > > The problem is that although the JAR is there, the POM isn't. > > > > If you go to http://jibx.sourceforge.net/maven2/org/jibx/jibx-run/1.1.3/, > > you'll see the jar, but Maven tries to download the pom from that > > directory, and can't. > > > > I can install it locally, but I shouldn't have to, and it breaks the > > whole maven paradigm of needing nothing more than the pom. > > > > Am I doing something wrong? I'll admit my maven knowledge is cursory.
> > Although the .pom files aren't there, it should not matter much, > because Maven will still download the JARs. > > Do you have a build failure because of the mission poms? Not at build time, no. If I use 1.1.3 in my dependency clauses in MY pom.xml, it seems maven can't find the 1.1.3 jibx-bind poms (since they aren't there), and drops back to the 1.0-RC1 poms, which it then downloads. However, since it binds with 1.0-RC1, but uses the 1.1.3 runtime jars, I get the runtime error that the binding compiler version is different than the jibx-run version, and throws an error. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
