I guess you can use a set-method for this collection and you can assign an empty collection if the given collection is null. You may want to have a look at the documentation of the set-method attribute at http://jibx.sourceforge.net/details/binding-attributes.html#property
regards.. Christian Bourque wrote: > Hi! > > Is this a normal behavior that the collection of an object is null > after unmarshalling it when that collection is initialized in the > constructor? > > I know that my XML in this example doesn't contain any element for > this collection but still I would like it to be initialized to an > empty collection instead of null! The logic of the code is based on > this assumption and cannot be changed! > > Is it Jibx that does this afterward the constructor was called? Is > there a workaround? > > Thanks > > Christian > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > jibx-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
