Robert,
We send objects out over the wire using Axis2/JiBX, and marshall out to
disk as straight XML also using JiBX.
We aren't using jibx2wsdl, but that should not be relevant.
Below is a snippet from the mapping file:
<mapping type-name="phase:PhaseQueryReturnType"
class="edu.iris.ws.phasepick.PhasePickQueryReturn" abstract="true" >
<structure name="IteratorInfo" field="iterator"
map-as="phase:IteratorInfoType" usage="optional" />
<collection field="events" >
<structure name="Event" map-as="ws:EventType" />
</collection>
</mapping>
<mapping name="PhaseQuery"
class="edu.iris.ws.phasepick.PhasePickQueryReturn" >
<!-- This mapping is used when writing the PhasePickQuery response
to disk as XML. -->
<collection field="events" >
<structure name="Event" map-as="ws:EventType" />
</collection>
</mapping>
note one abstract iwth a type-name, one concrete with a name. Same class.
Below is snippet of code that does the marshalling to disk.
private void bindDataToXml(PhasePickQueryReturn qReturn, File
outputFile) throws JiBXException, FileNotFoundException, IOException {
IBindingFactory bfact =
BindingDirectory.getFactory(PhasePickQueryReturn.class);
IMarshallingContext mctx = bfact.createMarshallingContext();
FileOutputStream fout = new FileOutputStream(outputFile);
mctx.marshalDocument(qReturn, "UTF-8", null, fout);
fout.close();
}
Hope this helps,
Linus
robert lazarski wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> I can run axis2 web services just fine - the binding compiler is
> working for me. What I can't figure out is how to prevent jib2wsdl
> from creating abstract mappings or marshalling with an abstract type
> and a type-name. If anyone has any ideas, please help.
>
> Robert
>
> On Nov 18, 2007 7:33 PM, Nigel Charman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Robert
>>
>> The IMarshallable interface is added to the class file by the JiBX
>> binding compiler. So long as you are running the binding compiler, the
>> IMarshallable interface will be available at runtime. In the Jibx2Wsdl
>> examples, search for the "bind" taskdef in the build.xml file to see an
>> example of invoking the binding compiler.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Nigel
>>
>> robert lazarski wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>>> Yet 'ExchangePermissionBO bo' doesn't implement IMarshallable. You say
>>> it doesn't need to. ok, so I'm approaching this wrong. What's the
>>> right way - or any way - to do this?
>>>
>>> Please help,
>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>> _______________________________________________
>> jibx-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>>
>>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
