Greetings, Using the schema below, the binding file ends up creating abstract mappings for all types other than CComplexObject. As you can see, only OBJECT_ID is supposed to be an abstract class. The generated java sources are fine, only OBJECTID Java class is abstract, but the binding file marks all classes involved in the abstract class as abstract, please see below for details: This is my schema, used with jibx v 1.2.3 under windows XP sp3.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns="http://schemas.openehr.org/v1"; targetNamespace="http://schemas.openehr.org/v1"; xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/AOM"; elementFormDefault="qualified"> <xs:element name="CComplexObject"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="NodeId" type="xs:string"></xs:element> <xs:element name="nodeNo" type="xs:int"></xs:element> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:complexType name="OBJECT_ID" abstract="true"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="value" type="xs:token"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="UID_BASED_ID"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="OBJECT_ID"> <xs:sequence/> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="OBJECT_REF"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="id" type="OBJECT_ID"/> <xs:element name="namespace" type="xs:token"/> <xs:element name="type" type="xs:token"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema> This is the generated binding.xml: Both UID_BASED_ID and OBJECT_REF are abstract=true, and serializing objectref instances in java gives an exception, saying that root level mapping is required etc. <binding xmlns:ns1="http://schemas.openehr.org/v1"; name="binding" package="org.openehr.schemas.v1" trim-whitespace="true"> <namespace uri="http://schemas.openehr.org/v1"; default="elements"/> <mapping class="org.openehr.schemas.v1.CComplexObject" name="CComplexObject"> <value style="element" name="NodeId" get-method="getNodeId" set-method="setNodeId"/> <value style="element" name="nodeNo" get-method="getNodeNo" set-method="setNodeNo"/> </mapping> <mapping abstract="true" type-name="ns1:OBJECT_ID" class="org.openehr.schemas.v1.OBJECTID"> <value style="element" name="value" get-method="getValue" set-method="setValue"/> </mapping> <mapping abstract="true" type-name="ns1:UID_BASED_ID" class="org.openehr.schemas.v1.UIDBASEDID"> <structure map-as="ns1:OBJECT_ID"/> </mapping> <mapping abstract="true" type-name="ns1:OBJECT_REF" class="org.openehr.schemas.v1.OBJECTREF"> <structure map-as="ns1:OBJECT_ID" get-method="getId" set-method="setId" name="id"/> <value style="element" name="namespace" get-method="getNamespace" set-method="setNamespace"/> <value style="element" name="type" get-method="getType" set-method="setType"/> </mapping> </binding> This is the binding file which works for me. When I remove the abstract=true from all classes other than OBJECTID, I get the expected behaviour. <binding xmlns:ns1="http://schemas.openehr.org/v1"; name="binding" package="org.openehr.schemas.v1" trim-whitespace="true"> <namespace uri="http://schemas.openehr.org/v1"; default="elements"/> <mapping class="org.openehr.schemas.v1.CComplexObject" name="CComplexObject"> <value style="element" name="NodeId" get-method="getNodeId" set-method="setNodeId"/> <value style="element" name="nodeNo" get-method="getNodeNo" set-method="setNodeNo"/> </mapping> <mapping factory="org.openehr.schemas.v1.OBJECTID.getObjId" abstract="true" type-name="ns1:OBJECT_ID" class="org.openehr.schemas.v1.OBJECTID"> <value style="element" name="value" get-method="getValue" set-method="setValue"/> </mapping> <mapping name="UID_BASED_ID" class="org.openehr.schemas.v1.UIDBASEDID"> <structure map-as="ns1:OBJECT_ID"/> </mapping> <mapping name="OBJECT_REF" class="org.openehr.schemas.v1.OBJECTREF"> <structure map-as="ns1:OBJECT_ID" get-method="getId" set-method="setId" name="id"/> <value style="element" name="namespace" get-method="getNamespace" set-method="setNamespace"/> <value style="element" name="type" get-method="getType" set-method="setType"/> </mapping> </binding> Am I doing something wrong here? I'll have to manually fix a large binding.xml if I can't figure out a way to make codegen create what I need. I'm also having trouble handling the deserialization of the field that is subclass of the abstract class, but that is another issue. Kind regards Seref ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
