Sounds good! On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/02/2015 23:40, Martin Buchholz wrote: > >> Maybe "jrt" could be generalized. Instead of simply "the" java run time >> of >> the current jdk, it could additionally be a function jrt(jredir) that >> somehow gives you the runtime classes of any jre, in a way that javac can >> understand. >> > This is how we want jrtfs to work eventually. If you specify a java.home > (encoded in the jrt URI or in the env specified to newFileSystem) then it > will load and forward to the provider that is locates in the target > runtime's jrt-fs.jar. We'll get there but needs a number of other issues > get sorted out first. > > -Alan. >
