On 14/10/2015 14:38, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Eg. "When only @java.beans.ConstructorProperties is used then rule 2
is not applicable to subset Profiles of Java SE that do not include
the java.beans package." ?
Adding "only" will would work too. You might consider "is present"
rather than "is used" as that seems to be prevailing terminology used
with annotations (isAnnotationPresent etc.).
Hm, shouldn't we name the new annotation differently then?
@ConstructorMapping ? It is not mandatory that we keep the actual name
- we are changing the package anyway ...
This may have been discussed previously, Mandy might know. I think at
one point that jmx-dev was thinking about matching on any @CP property
and that might have influenced the naming.
-Alan
