> On Oct 19, 2015, at 6:04 PM, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 19/10/2015 22:58, Mandy Chung wrote: >> Hi Chris, >> >> Thanks for reporting this (this is not a known issue). >> >> java.lang.InternalError: unnamed package in named module java.base >> >> The case with the unnamed package defined by the boot loader is the types >> from -Xbootclasspath/a. Is -Xbootclasspath/a being used? > Definitely something not right here as it looks like a type defined to the > boot loader that is in the unnamed package but it's module field set to > java.base. It feels like a corruption issue, either that or somehow a type in > the unnamed package was loaded really early (before java.base is defined) and > has somehow been patched to in the java.base module.
I pushed a fix to include the class name in the InternalError. If Chris is building jake, would you mind pulling down the patch and troubleshoot this and find out what class in the unnamed package? thanks Mandy
