----- Mail original ----- > De: "Mario Torre" <[email protected]> > À: "David M. Lloyd" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Envoyé: Mercredi 28 Octobre 2015 18:10:34 > Objet: Re: Jigsaw @ JavaOne 2015 > > 2015-10-28 17:59 GMT+01:00 David M. Lloyd <[email protected]>: > > We've been (with JBoss Modules and thus our various application server > > offerings) using module name conventions that match package names for > > several years, and the number of people who have actually been confused by > > it to my knowledge is exactly zero. > > > > The actual problem is probably quite overstated. People just don't seem to > > have trouble with this (nor do people generally seem to get confused by, > > for > > example, a C++ library name being the same as the root C++ namespace used > > by > > that library, to draw another language equivalent). > > Also, underscores in Java read weird :) > > Cheers, > Mario
yes, but with another separator it's worst (i know, it's not a real argument) with dots: (not obvious if it refers a package or a module) org.objectweb.asm, with dash: org-objectweb-asm, with underscores: org_objectweb_asm, with tilda: org~objectweb~asm with star: (this will cause trouble in shells) org*objectweb*asm with colon: org:objectweb:asm with double colons: org::objectweb::asm with bang: org!objectweb!asm any other idea ? cheers, Rémi > -- > pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF > Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF > > Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens > Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ > OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ > > Please, support open standards: > http://endsoftpatents.org/ >
