On 23/11/2015 15:27, Attila Szegedi wrote:
Folks,
I integrated the changes Mandy suggested; please review these (build related)
changes:
jdk9 top level:
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8141338/webrev.jdk9.top.2/index.html>
jdk9/jdk:
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8141338/webrev.jdk9.top.2/index.html>
For the sake of completeness, the jdk/nashorn changes are here:
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8141338/webrev.jdk9> but they have already
been reviewed by Hannes and Sundar; only the above two (jdk9 and jdk9/jdk) have been
modified compared to the original review request.
Sundar was kind enough to verify that JDK9 builds fine with these changes.
The jdk repo looks okay (just had to change your link to find it :-)
In the top-level repo then you've moved jdk.scripting.nashorn from
PROVIDER_MODULES to MAIN_MODULES. The reason that we've had it in
PROVIDER_MODULES is because we treat it as a service provider module (it
provides an implementation of javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory).
-Alan.
