> On Aug 8, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
> I think we can do this in phases, starting out with jlink picking up the 
> runtime version and using that to select the resources from the modular JAR 
> would be a good start. At some point we will have an update module path 
> implementation that better supports link time, in which case you can find 
> java.base and then use its version (as opposed to the runtime version) when 
> finding modules.

I think I have it right this time.  It’s much more complex unfortunately.

webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sdrach/8156499/webrev.01/ 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sdrach/8156499/webrev.01/>
issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156499 
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156499>

>> The issue has to do with multi-release jar files.  How do exploded images 
>> relate to multi-release jar files.
>> 
>> 
> If you look at the other jlink tests then you'll see that they skip silently 
> when on an exploded image (no packaged modules, meaning no JMOD files).

I couldn’t really find what you were referring to, other than a possibility in 
BascTest, so what I did is assure the module path only has the Mr. Jar file and 
jmods.  It’s possible that isn’t what you are looking for

Reply via email to