On 23/08/2016 20:49, Sander Mak wrote:

:

I can see how this happens: jdk.localedata is not automatically resolved 
because it is based on services, and there's a silent fallback to en_US if the 
nl_NL locale is not found. All perfectly explainable from a module-system 
technical point of view, but I think this will lead to lots of confused looks 
in applications relying on locales other than English locales. Not sure what to 
propose here, other than that this should be very well documented IMO. Maybe 
jlink could at least warn if the user's system locale is not among the default 
ones from java.base and suggest to add jdk.localedata to preserve local 
behavior. Granted, the image is probably targeted to other environments, but at 
least it's something.


A few things to mention on this:

1. It's an open issue in JEP 282 [1] as to whether jlink should support service binding.

2. The only required installed Locale is en_US, specified in java.util.Locale. I think at one point that the JRE download on Windows used to have a variant that didn't include all the locales in order to reduce the download size. You'll see similar issues with the extended charsets where java.base has the all the specified standard charsets, other extended charsets are in the jdk.charsets service provider module.

3. I don't know if you've found it yet but there is a jlink plugin for customizing the locales that are included in the run time image. In this case, you could use `--add-modules jdk.localedata --include-locales nl` (the value to --include-locales is the BCP 47 language tag). The main motive for this plugin is embedded builds where footprint is important and where you have some idea as to the countries or regions where the device will be used.

-Alan

[1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/282

Reply via email to