> On Sep 9, 2016, at 8:44 AM, David M. Lloyd <david.ll...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2016 06:48 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 8, 2016, at 3:29 PM, David M. Lloyd <david.ll...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to include a method like this (pretty old patch I had
>>> laying around):
>>>
>>> diff --git a/jdk/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ClassLoader.java
>>> b/jdk/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ClassLoader.java
>>> index 1bb1580..3def10e 100644
>>> --- a/jdk/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ClassLoader.java
>>> +++ b/jdk/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ClassLoader.java
>>> @@ -469,6 +477,15 @@ public abstract class ClassLoader {
>>> return lock;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /**
>>> + * Determine whether this class loader is parallel-capable.
>>> + *
>>> + * @return {@code true} if the class loader is parallel-capable,
>>> {@code false} otherwise
>>> + */
>>> + protected final boolean isParallelCapable() {
>>> + return ParallelLoaders.isRegistered(getClass());
>>> + }
>>> +
>>
>> This seems a fine method to add. I think it can be a public method (I don’t
>> see any reason it has to be protected)
>
> Great! Since it's such a small method though, would it be possible to just
> roll this change into some other changeset? I can't really contribute the
> change in any form other than a patch right now.
I file a RFE and Brent Christian has agreed to work on it and will go through
JDK 9 FC approval request.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165793
Mandy
