> On Oct 27, 2016, at 5:22 PM, Steve Drach <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’ve put out another webrev, > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sdrach/8156499/webrev.05/, that addresses Mandy’s > concerns. In particular I demonstrate that the resultant image is “runnable” > and that a Main class in the image can/cannot find the java.logging module > when the module-info.class is changed to require java.logging in one case but > not in the other.
Looks okay in general. The jlink change looks correct. Thanks for updating the test. Mandy
