Hi, are there any pending changes to the class file format? Looking forward to the Alpha 2 release :)
> On 11 Dec 2016, at 17:21, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/12/2016 13:05, Remi Forax wrote: > >> Hi Alan, >> if i get it right, the jdk9 b148 (not the jigsaw version) get a refresh of >> module-info classfile format but did not get the last two changes, >> version of requires and the two new constant pool entries. >> Do you plan to push these changes in the jdk9 workspace soon so i will delay >> the release of ASM 6 alpha 2 or do you plan to introduce these changes later >> so i should release an alpha 2 now and release an alpha 3/beta later ? >> >> > That's right. We are going to aim for jdk-9+150 to get the latest proposals > integrated. > > -Alan
