> On 21 Mar 2017, at 21:42, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> We have been accumulating changes in the jake forest for the last few weeks 
> to align with the proposals in JSR 376 and also to pick up API changes and 
> bug fixes. It's time to bring these changes into jdk9/dev. The issue to bring 
> these changes into jdk9/dev in bulk has been approved via the FC extension 
> process (still in use during JDK 9 RDP2).
> 
> A summary of the main changes is listed in JDK-8174823 [1], and the webrevs 
> with the changes to bring to jdk9/dev are here:
>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8174823/1/

The changes in the jdk repo look fine.

Should the @return for ModuleDescriptor.Requires::rawCompiledVersion contain
the same caveat as was added to compiledVersion?

  * @return The string containing the version of the module if recorded
  *                at compile-time, OR AN EMPTY OPTIONAL IF NO VERSION WAS 
RECORDED

-Chris.

Reply via email to