On 19/05/17 09:22, Alan Bateman wrote: > As I said, the goal has always been to allow someone create a run-time > image that only contains java.base. I'm not sure that subsuming > java.instrument into java.base is right. Introducing options to ask > jlink to exclude modules creates the potential for conflict on the > command line. One thing that jlink could do is emit a warning that the > resulting run-time image doesn't have the management and instrumentation > features, might that be the right balance.
Like Remi, I think this is an entirely reasonable position. regards, Andrew Dinn ----------- Senior Principal Software Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander