[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-11347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17279348#comment-17279348
]
Paul Taylor edited comment on ARROW-11347 at 2/5/21, 5:34 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
[~domoritz] see my comment here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-11351?focusedCommentId=17279344&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17279344
tl;dr; the Row API doesn't use JS's Map, the abstract Row base class just
implements the Map interface. The actual lookup is delegated to its concrete
subclass implementations StructRow and MapRow. StructRow still uses the
flyweight pattern, and MapRow attempts a different optimization via Proxies if
available.
was (Author: paul.e.taylor):
[~domoritz] see my comment here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-11351?focusedCommentId=17279344&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17279344
tl;dr; the Row API doesn't use JS's Map, the abstract Row base class just
implements the Map interface. The actual lookup is delegated to its concrete
subclass implementations StructRow and MapRow. StructRow still uses the
flyweight, and MapRow attempts a similar optimization via Proxies if available.
> [JavaScript] Consider Objects instead of Maps
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-11347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-11347
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JavaScript
> Reporter: Dominik Moritz
> Priority: Major
> Labels: performance
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> A quick experiment
> (https://observablehq.com/@domoritz/performance-of-maps-vs-objects) seems to
> show that object accesses are a lot faster than map accesses. Would it make
> sense to switch to objects in the row API to improve performance?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
