[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-7224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17292100#comment-17292100
 ] 

Andy Douglas commented on ARROW-7224:
-------------------------------------

Is there any update on this?

I'm also finding that instantiation a pyarrrow dataset containing a large 
number of files is slow even when passing paths explicitly. I've tried dropping 
to the parquet dataset interface and disabling schema validation, but it's 
still slow. 

In general, is there a way of caching information regarding partitions/files 
perhaps within the metadata? I was thinking perhaps of a hierarchical setup 
which was supported by the query language where the query is initially 
evaluated on the partition/files cache (if present) to determine the list of 
relevant files. Then a dataset is instantiated by explicitly passing the list 
of relevant files before finally evaluating the query on this. This could be 
supported outside of pyarrow but I've struggled to find a way to evaluate the 
parts of the query relevant to the partitions without separating out into a 
separate query which is clunky.

> [C++][Dataset] Partition level filters should be able to provide filtering to 
> file systems
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-7224
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-7224
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Micah Kornfield
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: dataset
>
> When providing a filter for partitions, it should be possible in some cases 
> to use it to optimize file system list calls.  This can greatly improve the 
> speed for reading data from partitions because fewer number of 
> directories/files need to be explored/expanded.  I've fallen behind on the 
> dataset code, but I want to make sure this issue is tracked someplace.  This 
> came up in SO question linked below (feel free to correct my analysis if I 
> missed the functionality someplace).
> Reference: 
> [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58868584/pyarrow-parquetdataset-read-is-slow-on-a-hive-partitioned-s3-dataset-despite-u/58951477#58951477]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to