[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17361065#comment-17361065
]
Jonathan Keane commented on ARROW-12708:
----------------------------------------
[~pachamaltese] Are you seeing something problematic in the build step? What's
going on there? That's not the important / helpful part of the error.
Here is an example of the kinds of output you should be looking for (and
contributing with these tickets that you make):
{code}
> test_check("arrow", reporter = arrow_reporter)
System has not been booted with systemd as init system (PID 1). Can't operate.
Failed to create bus connection: Host is down
==3131== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3131== at 0x4DA2798: __printf_fphex (printf_fphex.c:215)
==3131== by 0x4DB8434: printf_positional (vfprintf-internal.c:2072)
==3131== by 0x4DB9F4C: __vfprintf_internal (vfprintf-internal.c:1733)
==3131== by 0x4DCF119: __vsnprintf_internal (vsnprintf.c:114)
==3131== by 0x4982F60: Rvsnprintf_mbcs (errors.c:301)
==3131== by 0x49885EE: vsignalError (errors.c:1827)
==3131== by 0x498576A: Rf_errorcall (errors.c:906)
==3131== by 0xD8E7A12: decltype (((declval<void (*&)(SEXPREC*, char const*,
...)>)())((declval<SEXPREC*&>)(), (declval<char const*&&>)()))
cpp11::detail::apply<void (*&)(SEXPREC*, char const*, ...), SEXPREC*&, char
const*&&, 0ul, 1ul>(void (*&)(SEXPREC*, char const*, ...),
std::tuple<SEXPREC*&, char const*&&>&&, cpp11::detail::index_sequence<0ul, 1ul>
const&) (protect.hpp:125)
==3131== by 0xD8E748E: decltype (((declval<void (*&)(SEXPREC*, char const*,
...)>)())((declval<SEXPREC*&>)(), (declval<char const*&&>)()))
cpp11::detail::apply<void (*&)(SEXPREC*, char const*, ...), SEXPREC*&, char
const*&&>(void (*&)(SEXPREC*, char const*, ...), std::tuple<SEXPREC*&, char
const*&&>&&) (protect.hpp:131)
==3131== by 0xD8E6999: cpp11::detail::closure<void (SEXPREC*, char const*,
...), SEXPREC*&, char const*&&>::operator()() && (protect.hpp:144)
==3131== by 0xD8E6112: void
cpp11::unwind_protect<cpp11::detail::closure<void (SEXPREC*, char const*, ...),
SEXPREC*&, char const*&&>, void>(cpp11::detail::closure<void (SEXPREC*, char
const*, ...), SEXPREC*&, char const*&&>&&)::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const
(protect.hpp:76)
==3131== by 0xD8E69F1: SEXPREC* cpp11::unwind_protect<void
cpp11::unwind_protect<cpp11::detail::closure<void (SEXPREC*, char const*, ...),
SEXPREC*&, char const*&&>, void>(cpp11::detail::closure<void (SEXPREC*, char
const*, ...), SEXPREC*&, char const*&&>&&)::{lambda()#1},
void>(cpp11::detail::closure<void (SEXPREC*, char const*, ...), SEXPREC*&, char
const*&&>&&)::{lambda(void*)#2}::operator()(void
cpp11::unwind_protect<cpp11::detail::closure<void (SEXPREC*, char const*, ...),
SEXPREC*&, char const*&&>, void>(cpp11::detail::closure<void (SEXPREC*, char
const*, ...), SEXPREC*&, char const*&&>&&)::{lambda()#1}) const (protect.hpp:51)
==3131== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==3131== at 0x4985677: Rf_errorcall (errors.c:898)
==3131==
==3131== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3131== at 0x4DA27B2: __printf_fphex (printf_fphex.c:215)
==3131== by 0x4DB8434: printf_positional (vfprintf-internal.c:2072)
[... many (~ 11045) similar valgrind errors]
[ FAIL 0 | WARN 6 | SKIP 57 | PASS 3839 ]
Warning message:
In system("timedatectl", intern = TRUE) :
running command 'timedatectl' had status 1
>
==3131==
==3131== HEAP SUMMARY:
==3131== in use at exit: 318,218,757 bytes in 61,489 blocks
==3131== total heap usage: 3,562,658 allocs, 3,501,169 frees, 2,690,774,195
bytes allocated
==3131==
==3131== LEAK SUMMARY:
==3131== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3131== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3131== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3131== still reachable: 318,218,757 bytes in 61,489 blocks
==3131== of which reachable via heuristic:
==3131== newarray : 4,264 bytes in 1 blocks
==3131== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3131== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==3131== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==3131==
==3131== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==3131== ERROR SUMMARY: 11045 errors from 101 contexts (suppressed: 2 from 1)
Found Valgrind errors
{code}
> [C++] Valgrind errors when calling negate_checked
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-12708
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12708
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Jonathan Keane
> Assignee: Eduardo Ponce
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: valgrind-log-2021-06-10-docker-step-only.txt
>
>
> We've started seeing Valgrind in our R tests. I did some digging through the
> commits and found that these errors started when
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/0d979bf0cbb10e4977c99a542c266134604e72a5
> was merged (ARROW-12575).
> As far as I know, this is the first use of {{negate_checked}} in R, so that
> is the likely culprit, though I haven't been able to match the error outputs
> to the {{negate_checked}} code directly.
> Here's the first failure:
> https://dev.azure.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/_build/results?buildId=4805&view=logs&j=0da5d1d9-276d-5173-c4c4-9d4d4ed14fdb&t=d9b15392-e4ce-5e4c-0c8c-b69645229181&l=2942
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
