[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17403772#comment-17403772
 ] 

Lance Dacey commented on ARROW-12358:
-------------------------------------

kDeleteMatchingPartitions - So this only deletes the individual partitions and 
not the entire dataset correct? So if I save a dataset made up of hundreds of 
partitions but only 4 of them are written to, then only those 4 partitions will 
have their existing files cleared? If so, then yes that should work for me.

 

 

> [C++][Python][R][Dataset] Control overwriting vs appending when writing to 
> existing dataset
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-12358
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12358
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Joris Van den Bossche
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: dataset
>             Fix For: 6.0.0
>
>
> Currently, the dataset writing (eg with {{pyarrow.dataset.write_dataset}} 
> uses a fixed filename template ({{"part\{i\}.ext"}}). This means that when 
> you are writing to an existing dataset, you de facto overwrite previous data 
> when using this default template.
> There is some discussion in ARROW-10695 about how the user can avoid this by 
> ensuring the file names are unique (the user can specify the 
> {{basename_template}} to be something unique). There is also ARROW-7706 about 
> silently doubling data (so _not_ overwriting existing data) with the legacy 
> {{parquet.write_to_dataset}} implementation. 
> It could be good to have a "mode" when writing datasets that controls the 
> different possible behaviours. And erroring when there is pre-existing data 
> in the target directory is maybe the safest default, because both appending 
> vs overwriting silently can be surprising behaviour depending on your 
> expectations.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to