[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-16616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17557566#comment-17557566
 ] 

Will Jones commented on ARROW-16616:
------------------------------------

{quote}In the R package we handle this by building a separate query object that 
contains the Dataset (or RecordBatchReader, or Table, or whatever), and the 
query object contains the filtering etc. methods.
{quote}
Yeah, I think it seems like the PR as-is would be trying to make {{Dataset}} 
into this kind of query object, which I don't think is it's purpose. 
{{Scanner}} seems closer to that to me, but it's also a bit of a mismatch.
{quote}That said, going that route (or the FilteredDataset path, for that 
matter) feels like a path to essentially creating ibis in pyarrow.
{quote}
IMO we need to have a larger conversation about how much of Acero we want to 
expose in PyArrow. We might want a low-level API for creating exec plans, and 
maybe even some high-level functions like this. But seems like we should have a 
design doc to think about what our vision in here and how that does relate to 
developments in Ibis.

> [Python] Allow lazy evaluation of filters in Dataset and add Datset.filter 
> method
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-16616
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-16616
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Python
>            Reporter: Alessandro Molina
>            Assignee: Alessandro Molina
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 9.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> To keep the {{Dataset}} api compatible with the {{Table}} one in terms of 
> analytics capabilities, we should add a {{Dataset.filter}} method. The 
> initial POC was based on {{_table_filter}} but that required materialising 
> all the {{Dataset}} content after filtering as it returned an 
> {{{}InMemoryDataset{}}}. 
> Given that {{Scanner}} can filter a dataset without actually materialising 
> the data until a final step happens, it would be good to have 
> {{Dataset.filter}} return some form of lazy dataset when the filter is only 
> stored aside and the Scanner is created when data is actually retrieved.
> PS: Also update {{test_dataset_filter}} test to use the {{Dataset.filter}} 
> method



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to