[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17578468#comment-17578468
 ] 

Rok Mihevc commented on ARROW-17386:
------------------------------------

It's either strftime or strptime working in an unexpected way. We should 
rewrite the test to be more explicit and only test strptime (like we do 
parse_date_time: 
https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/r/tests/testthat/test-dplyr-funcs-datetime.R#L2382-L2400).

> [R] strptime tests not robust across platforms
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-17386
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17386
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: R
>            Reporter: Neal Richardson
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 9.0.1
>
>
> After the 9.0.0 release was accepted on CRAN, Ripley emailed me about a test 
> failure on some other machine, which has not yet shown up on CRAN checks:
> {code}
> ── Failure (test-dplyr-funcs-datetime.R:183:5): strptime 
> ───────────────────────
>   `object` (`actual`) not equal to `expected` (`expected`).
>   
>   actual vs expected
>                                       x
>   - actual[1, ]                      NA
>   + expected[1, ]   1999-03-16 12:22:20
>   - actual[2, ]                      NA
>   + expected[2, ]   1999-10-08 18:02:24
>   - actual[3, ]                      NA
>   + expected[3, ]   1999-04-04 03:52:27
>   - actual[4, ]                      NA
>   + expected[4, ]   1999-05-28 11:35:45
>   - actual[5, ]                      NA
>   + expected[5, ]   1999-03-16 08:08:55
>   - actual[6, ]                      NA
>   + expected[6, ]   1999-09-25 00:19:59
>   - actual[7, ]                      NA
>   + expected[7, ]   1999-10-12 20:47:55
>   - actual[8, ]                      NA
>   + expected[8, ]   1999-04-15 20:36:12
>   - actual[9, ]                      NA
>   + expected[9, ]   1999-05-01 03:55:23
>   - actual[10, ]                     NA
>   + expected[10, ]  1999-12-15 01:19:05
>   and 90 more ...
>   
>        actual$x | expected$x                           
>    [1] NA       - "1999-03-16 12:22:20" [1]            
>    [2] NA       - "1999-10-08 18:02:24" [2]            
>    [3] NA       - "1999-04-04 03:52:27" [3]            
>    [4] NA       - "1999-05-28 11:35:45" [4]            
>    [5] NA       - "1999-03-16 08:08:55" [5]            
>    [6] NA       - "1999-09-25 00:19:59" [6]            
>    [7] NA       - "1999-10-12 20:47:55" [7]            
>    [8] NA       - "1999-04-15 20:36:12" [8]            
>    [9] NA       - "1999-05-01 03:55:23" [9]            
>   [10] NA       - "1999-12-15 01:19:05" [10]           
>    ... ...        ...                   and 90 more ...
>   Backtrace:
>       ▆
>    1. └─arrow:::expect_equal(...) at test-dplyr-funcs-datetime.R:183:4
>    2.   └─testthat::expect_equal(...) at 
> tests/testthat/helper-expectation.R:42:4
>   
>   [ FAIL 1 | WARN 0 | SKIP 79 | PASS 8173 ]
> {code}
> It appears that one of the strptime tests returns NA in Arrow but not in R. 
> Reading the test, it uses R to first strftime and then tests that Arrow and R 
> both strptime that back, so it could be an R quirk: R recognizes and can do 
> something with this strptime token round trip, but our library doesn't. 
> Unfortunately, I don't know which token it is though because these tests are 
> run in a for loop and the failure message doesn't say which token is the one 
> that is failing. testthat does provide some facilities for reporting useful 
> things within a loop, so we should wire those up. 
> In addition to better handling of tests in a loop, we should probably just 
> skip this whole thing on CRAN.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to