[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-18148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17623979#comment-17623979
]
Stephanie Hazlitt commented on ARROW-18148:
-------------------------------------------
The other {{{}arrow::read_*(){}}}functions don't use the {{_file}} in the name,
just {{{}read_ipc_file(){}}}, which I am guessing is because we also have
{{{}read_ipc_stream(){}}}. I wonder if {{read_arrow}} and {{read_arrow_stream}}
would work and be more consistent with the naming API?
> [R] Rename read_ipc_file to read_arrow_file & highlight arrow over feather
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-18148
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-18148
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation, R
> Reporter: Stephanie Hazlitt
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: feather
>
> Following up from [this mailing list
> conversation|https://lists.apache.org/thread/nxncph842h8tyovxp04hrzq4y35lq4xq],
> I am wondering if the R package should rename `read_ipc_file()` /
> write_ipc_file()` to `read_arrow_file()`/ `write_arrow_file()`, or add an
> additional alias for both. It might also be helpful to update the
> documentation so that users read "Write an Arrow file (formerly known as a
> Feather file)" rather than the current Feather-named first approach, assuming
> there is a community decision to coalesce around the name Arrow for the file
> format, and the project is moving on from the name Feather.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
