[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17657528#comment-17657528
 ] 

Rok Mihevc commented on ARROW-494:
----------------------------------

This issue has been migrated to [issue 
#15346|https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15346] on GitHub. Please see the 
[migration documentation|https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/14542] for 
further details.

> [C++] When MemoryMappedFile is destructed, memory is unmapped even if buffer 
> referecnes still exist
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-494
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-494
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Wes McKinney
>            Assignee: Wes McKinney
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.2.0
>
>
> I'd like to see if there is some way to "protect" the memory map from 
> premature destruction. This is a slight artifact of MemoryMappedFile's 
> implementation sharing code with normal on-disk files (which read into 
> allocated memory), i.e. the `Close` function unmaps the memory and closes the 
> file handle. This would amount to creating a Buffer subclass that retains 
> ownership of the file descriptor and memory map, so that if any Buffer still 
> references the memory map, then `MemoryMappedFile::Close` will not unmap the 
> memory or close the file. But then the unmapping / file close would need to 
> happen when the last Buffer reference is destroyed. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to