[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17577390#comment-17577390
 ] 

Stefan Bischof commented on JENA-2344:
--------------------------------------

Thank you for your quick reaction!

 

And - after further testing - this is indeed fixed by version 4.5.0. Apparently 
I still had version 4.2 in my path although I ran the arq.bat from the 4.5.0 
directory.

The current version doesn't try to abbreviate the URI in the context. That also 
solves the problem. Although I would have preferred to have in in the context 
with a "meter" key.

 

Follow-up question: is it possible to configure Fuseki with a JSON-LD context 
URL which it then uses to compact the JSON-LD response?

> Invalid JSON-LD context generated for CONSTRUCT query
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-2344
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2344
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ARQ, Fuseki, JSON-LD
>    Affects Versions: Jena 4.1.0, Jena 4.5.0
>            Reporter: Stefan Bischof
>            Priority: Major
>
> For URIs having a slash / in the fragment identifier an invalid JSON-LD 
> context is generated.
>  
> Steps to reproduce:
>  # Add a triple with with a slash in the fragment identifier to some graph, 
> e.g., "[] 
> <[https://smart-data-models.github.io/data-models/terms.jsonld#/definitions/category]>
>  "meter" .
>  # Retrieve the triple in a CONSTRUCT query, e.g., CONSTRUCT WHERE \{ ?s ?p 
> ?o }
>  # Set "Accept" header in HTTP call or "Content-Type (Graph)" in Fuseki WebUI
>  # The context at the end of the response includes the invalid key 
> "/definitions/category"
> {
>   "@id" : "_:b0",
>   "/definitions/category" : "meter",
>   "@context" : {
>     "/definitions/category" : {
>       "@id" : 
> "https://smart-data-models.github.io/data-models/terms.jsonld#/definitions/category";
>     }
>   }
> }
>  
> Although I couldn't find a formal grammar for JSON-LD, the python parser I 
> used and the parser on the JSON-LD playground 
> [https://json-ld.org/playground/] did not accept this: jsonld.SyntaxError: 
> Invalid JSON-LD syntax; term in form of IRI must expand to definition.
> I could replicate the same behaviour on the cli with ARQ 4.5.0.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to