[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Devarshi Shah updated KAFKA-13995:
----------------------------------
    Description: I've gone through the Apache Kafka Documentation. It does not 
contain information about the support of underlying storage type, whether Kafka 
supports block storage, Network File System (NFS) and/or others. On the 
internet, I could find that it supports NFS, however most of them summarize not 
to use NFS in Production. May we get proper information whether Kafka 
recommends NFS in Production, or it doesn't support NFS to begin with?  (was: 
I've gone through the Apache Kafka Documentation. It does not contain 
information about the support of underlying storage type, whether Kafka 
supports block storage, Network File System (NFS). On the internet, I could 
find that it supports NFS, however most of them summarize not to use NFS in 
Production. May we get proper information whether Kafka recommends NFS, or it 
doesn't support NFS to begin with?)

> Does Kafka support Network File System (NFS)? Is it recommended in Production?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-13995
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13995
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Test
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>         Environment: Kubernetes Cluster
>            Reporter: Devarshi Shah
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> I've gone through the Apache Kafka Documentation. It does not contain 
> information about the support of underlying storage type, whether Kafka 
> supports block storage, Network File System (NFS) and/or others. On the 
> internet, I could find that it supports NFS, however most of them summarize 
> not to use NFS in Production. May we get proper information whether Kafka 
> recommends NFS in Production, or it doesn't support NFS to begin with?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to