[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Adam Kotwasinski updated KAFKA-6830:
------------------------------------
    Description: 
Currently, we have only one fetch request-related metric for a topic.
 As fetch requests are used by both client consumers and replicating brokers, 
it is impossible to tell if the particular partition (with replication factor > 
1) is being actively read from client by consumers.

Rationale for this improvement: as owner of kafka installation, but not the 
owner of clients, I want to know which topics still have active (real) 
consumers.

Patch attached.

  was:
Currently, we have only one fetch request-related metric for a topic.
As fetch requests are used by both client consumers and replicating brokers, it 
is impossible to tell if the particular partition (with replication factor > 1) 
is being actively read from client by consumers.

Rationale for this improvement: as owner of kafka installation, but not the 
owner of clients, I want to know which topics still have active (real) 
consumers.


> Add new metrics for consumer/replication fetch requests
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-6830
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6830
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Adam Kotwasinski
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, we have only one fetch request-related metric for a topic.
>  As fetch requests are used by both client consumers and replicating brokers, 
> it is impossible to tell if the particular partition (with replication factor 
> > 1) is being actively read from client by consumers.
> Rationale for this improvement: as owner of kafka installation, but not the 
> owner of clients, I want to know which topics still have active (real) 
> consumers.
> Patch attached.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to