lucasbru commented on code in PR #14937:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14937#discussion_r1426388734
##########
clients/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/AsyncKafkaConsumerTest.java:
##########
@@ -810,89 +854,87 @@ public void
testGroupMetadataAfterCreationWithGroupIdIsNotNullAndGroupInstanceId
final Properties props = requiredConsumerPropertiesAndGroupId(groupId);
props.put(ConsumerConfig.GROUP_INSTANCE_ID_CONFIG, groupInstanceId);
final ConsumerConfig config = new ConsumerConfig(props);
- try (final AsyncKafkaConsumer<String, String> consumer =
- new AsyncKafkaConsumer<>(config, new StringDeserializer(), new
StringDeserializer())) {
-
- final ConsumerGroupMetadata groupMetadata =
consumer.groupMetadata();
-
- assertEquals(groupId, groupMetadata.groupId());
- assertEquals(Optional.of(groupInstanceId),
groupMetadata.groupInstanceId());
- assertEquals(JoinGroupRequest.UNKNOWN_GENERATION_ID,
groupMetadata.generationId());
- assertEquals(JoinGroupRequest.UNKNOWN_MEMBER_ID,
groupMetadata.memberId());
- }
+ final AsyncKafkaConsumer<String, String> consumer =
+ new AsyncKafkaConsumer<>(config, new StringDeserializer(), new
StringDeserializer());
+ final ConsumerGroupMetadata groupMetadata = consumer.groupMetadata();
+ assertEquals(groupId, groupMetadata.groupId());
+ assertEquals(Optional.of(groupInstanceId),
groupMetadata.groupInstanceId());
+ assertEquals(JoinGroupRequest.UNKNOWN_GENERATION_ID,
groupMetadata.generationId());
+ assertEquals(JoinGroupRequest.UNKNOWN_MEMBER_ID,
groupMetadata.memberId());
+ consumer.close(Duration.ZERO);
}
@Test
public void testGroupMetadataUpdateSingleCall() {
final String groupId = "consumerGroupA";
final ConsumerConfig config = new
ConsumerConfig(requiredConsumerPropertiesAndGroupId(groupId));
final LinkedBlockingQueue<BackgroundEvent> backgroundEventQueue = new
LinkedBlockingQueue<>();
- try (final AsyncKafkaConsumer<String, String> consumer =
Review Comment:
I didn't mean to revert the changes, but discard them when we merge with the
asyncKafkaConsumer refactoring. Is it possible these changes were required to
not run OOM?
One option would be to rebase this PR on the refactoring, which can possibly
resolve these OOMs.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
