iit2009060 commented on PR #15060: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15060#issuecomment-1877528171
> Thanks @iit2009060 for the PR. > > Let us say there are two segments in remote storage and subsequents segments in local storage. remote-seg-10[10, 20], remote-seg-21[21, 30] : offsets 25 to 30 are compacted. local-seg-31[31, 40] > > When a fetch request comes for offsets with in [25, 30] then it should move to the local segment as those offsets might have been compacted earlier. Did you also cover this scenario in this PR? @satishd I am trying to reproduce the case when last offsets of the segment earlier than the active segment is compacted away. I tried locally but not able to reproduce the above scenario ? There always exist a last offset in the segment earlier than the active segment. As per the article https://towardsdatascience.com/log-compacted-topics-in-apache-kafka-b1aa1e4665a7 All records in the active segment are never compacted. @satishd Do you have a step in mind to regenerate the above scenario ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
