[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16567498#comment-16567498
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-6761:
---------------------------------------

bbejeck opened a new pull request #5453: MINOR: Follow up for KAFKA-6761 graph 
should add stores for consistency
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5453
 
 
   While working on 4th PR, I noticed that I had missed adding stores via the 
graph vs. directly via the `InternalStreamsBuilder`.  Probably ok to do so, but 
we should be consistent.
   
   For testing, I ran the existing tests in streams.
   
   ### Committer Checklist (excluded from commit message)
   - [ ] Verify design and implementation 
   - [ ] Verify test coverage and CI build status
   - [ ] Verify documentation (including upgrade notes)
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Reduce Kafka Streams Footprint
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-6761
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6761
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Bill Bejeck
>            Assignee: Bill Bejeck
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>
> The persistent storage footprint of a Kafka Streams application contains the 
> following aspects:
>  # The internal topics created on the Kafka cluster side.
>  # The materialized state stores on the Kafka Streams application instances 
> side.
> There have been some questions about reducing these footprints, especially 
> since many of them are not necessary. For example, there are redundant 
> internal topics, as well as unnecessary state stores that takes up space but 
> also affect performance. When people are pushing Streams to production with 
> high traffic, this issue would be more common and severe. Reducing the 
> footprint of Streams have clear benefits for reducing resource utilization of 
> Kafka Streams applications, and also not creating pressure on broker's 
> capacities.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to