kamalcph commented on code in PR #15825: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15825#discussion_r1610895466
########## core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/DelayedFetch.scala: ########## @@ -91,19 +91,23 @@ class DelayedFetch( // Go directly to the check for Case G if the message offsets are the same. If the log segment // has just rolled, then the high watermark offset will remain the same but be on the old segment, // which would incorrectly be seen as an instance of Case F. - if (endOffset.messageOffset != fetchOffset.messageOffset) { - if (endOffset.onOlderSegment(fetchOffset)) { - // Case F, this can happen when the new fetch operation is on a truncated leader - debug(s"Satisfying fetch $this since it is fetching later segments of partition $topicIdPartition.") - return forceComplete() + if (fetchOffset.messageOffset > endOffset.messageOffset) { + // Case F, this can happen when the new fetch operation is on a truncated leader + debug(s"Satisfying fetch $this since it is fetching later segments of partition $topicIdPartition.") + return forceComplete() + } else if (fetchOffset.messageOffset < endOffset.messageOffset) { + if (fetchOffset.messageOffsetOnly() || endOffset.messageOffsetOnly()) { Review Comment: Not clear on this one. The current `if` checks are easy to read, we can add one debug log to avoid the empty `if` block. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org