ableegoldman commented on code in PR #16052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16052#discussion_r1612403956


##########
streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/assignment/assignors/StickyTaskAssignor.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.assignment.assignors;
+
+import static java.util.Collections.unmodifiableMap;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.Collections;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.HashSet;
+import java.util.Iterator;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Objects;
+import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.TreeSet;
+import java.util.stream.Collectors;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.TaskId;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.assignment.ApplicationState;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.assignment.KafkaStreamsAssignment;
+import 
org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.assignment.KafkaStreamsAssignment.AssignedTask;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.assignment.KafkaStreamsState;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.assignment.ProcessId;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.assignment.TaskAssignmentUtils;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.assignment.TaskAssignor;
+import org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.assignment.TaskInfo;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+
+
+public class StickyTaskAssignor implements TaskAssignor {
+    private static final Logger LOG = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(StickyTaskAssignor.class);
+
+    private Map<String, ?> configs = new HashMap<>();
+    private final boolean mustPreserveActiveTaskAssignment;
+
+    public StickyTaskAssignor() {
+        this(false);
+    }
+
+    public StickyTaskAssignor(final boolean mustPreserveActiveTaskAssignment) {
+        this.mustPreserveActiveTaskAssignment = 
mustPreserveActiveTaskAssignment;
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public void configure(final Map<String, ?> configs) {
+        // TODO: The application state already has the assignment configs 
object, why should this
+        //       assignor be configurable?
+        this.configs = configs;
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public TaskAssignment assign(final ApplicationState applicationState) {
+        final int taskCount = applicationState.allTasks().size();
+        if (taskCount == 0) {

Review Comment:
   technically this would be a bug, that should be caught prior to ever 
invoking the assignor, so I don't think we should/need to check this
   
   Also: I would say that if we did want to return an empty assignment, it 
should be a real TaskAssignment with a KafkaStreamsAssignment for each 
KafkaStreamsState that appears in the ApplicationState, but with those just 
being empty KafkaStreamsAssignment objects (ie no actual tasks assigned).
   
   I actually think it should be considered an error if the returned 
`TaskAssignment` does not contain a KafkaStreamsAssignment for each 
KafkaStreamsState in the input. When we get around to implementing the 
assignment validation and `#onAssignmentComputed` callback with the error 
codes, we should probably have a dedicated error code for this case (if we 
don't already, don't remember exactly which error codes we had in the original 
KIP)
   
   Doesn't matter for now since imo we should remove this check altogether, but 
good to keep in mind



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to