[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16654757#comment-16654757
]
Dong Lin commented on KAFKA-7481:
---------------------------------
Option 2 sounds good to me. For option 2, it is true that "features which
depend on the persistent format could not be tested". This is anyway the case
for all other features (e.g. transaction semantics) that depends on the newer
message format, right? So this is the existing state and I probably will not
call it the downside of option 2.
> Consider options for safer upgrade of offset commit value schema
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-7481
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7481
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jason Gustafson
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>
> KIP-211 and KIP-320 add new versions of the offset commit value schema. The
> use of the new schema version is controlled by the
> `inter.broker.protocol.version` configuration. Once the new inter-broker
> version is in use, it is not possible to downgrade since the older brokers
> will not be able to parse the new schema.
> The options at the moment are the following:
> 1. Do nothing. Users can try the new version and keep
> `inter.broker.protocol.version` locked to the old release. Downgrade will
> still be possible, but users will not be able to test new capabilities which
> depend on inter-broker protocol changes.
> 2. Instead of using `inter.broker.protocol.version`, we could use
> `message.format.version`. This would basically extend the use of this config
> to apply to all persistent formats. The advantage is that it allows users to
> upgrade the broker and begin using the new inter-broker protocol while still
> allowing downgrade. But features which depend on the persistent format could
> not be tested.
> Any other options?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
