lianetm commented on code in PR #18089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18089#discussion_r1880508552


##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/AbstractMembershipManager.java:
##########
@@ -1175,21 +1175,8 @@ private CompletableFuture<Void> assignPartitions(
 
         // Invoke user call back.
         CompletableFuture<Void> result = 
signalPartitionsAssigned(addedPartitions);
-        result.whenComplete((__, exception) -> {
-            if (exception == null) {
-                // Enable newly added partitions to start fetching and 
updating positions for them.
-                
subscriptions.enablePartitionsAwaitingCallback(addedPartitions);
-            } else {
-                // Keeping newly added partitions as non-fetchable after the 
callback failure.
-                // They will be retried on the next reconciliation loop, until 
it succeeds or the
-                // broker removes them from the assignment.
-                if (!addedPartitions.isEmpty()) {
-                    log.warn("Leaving newly assigned partitions {} marked as 
non-fetchable and not " +
-                            "requiring initializing positions after 
onPartitionsAssigned callback failed.",
-                        addedPartitions, exception);
-                }
-            }
-        });
+        // Enable newly added partitions to start fetching and updating 
positions for them.
+        result.whenComplete((__, exception) -> 
subscriptions.enablePartitionsAwaitingCallback(addedPartitions));

Review Comment:
   > I agree that the current behavior appears to be a bug, but addressing it 
may require a KIP (or further discussion) to define the new behavior of the 
callback in handling exceptions. For now, this PR can focus on fixing the 
inconsistent behavior.
   
   Sorry I didn't mean to introduce anything new for recovery, just calling 
`enablePartitionsAwaitingCallback` passing assigned partitions instead of 
adding partitions. That call will be harmless if the assigned partitions are 
already enabled, but it will fix the bug that assigned partitions for which the 
callback previously failed remain unfetchable, right? Would that work to fix 
the inconsistency? (agree that here we're trying to make the 2 consumer behave 
in the same way, nothing more)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to