chirag-wadhwa5 commented on code in PR #18696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18696#discussion_r1937022015
##########
core/src/main/java/kafka/server/share/SharePartition.java:
##########
@@ -2160,6 +2234,43 @@ private long startOffsetDuringInitialization(long
partitionDataStartOffset) thro
}
}
+ // Visible for testing
+ long findLastOffsetAcknowledged() {
+ lock.readLock().lock();
+ long lastOffsetAcknowledged = -1;
+ try {
+ for (NavigableMap.Entry<Long, InFlightBatch> entry :
cachedState.entrySet()) {
+ InFlightBatch inFlightBatch = entry.getValue();
+ if (inFlightBatch.offsetState() == null) {
+ if
(!isRecordStateAcknowledged(inFlightBatch.batchState())) {
+ return lastOffsetAcknowledged;
+ }
+ // If initialReadGapOffset.gapStartOffset is less than or
equal to the last offset of the batch
+ // then we cannot identify the current inFlightBatch as
acknowledged. All the offsets between
+ // initialReadGapOffset.gapStartOffset and
initialReadGapOffset.endOffset should always be present
+ // in the cachedState
+ if (initialReadGapOffset != null &&
inFlightBatch.lastOffset() >= initialReadGapOffset.gapStartOffset()) {
+ return lastOffsetAcknowledged;
+ }
Review Comment:
Yes, you are right, we can move the if check outside the. The current
approach would be useful if gapStartOffset could lie between a gap, but I guess
that's not possible.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
