chenyulin0719 commented on code in PR #18513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/18513#discussion_r1938857657
##########
core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/api/PlaintextAdminIntegrationTest.scala:
##########
@@ -4003,6 +3939,77 @@ class PlaintextAdminIntegrationTest extends
BaseAdminIntegrationTest {
ConfigSource.DYNAMIC_TOPIC_CONFIG, false, false,
Collections.emptyList(), null, null),
topicConfigs.get(TopicConfig.INDEX_INTERVAL_BYTES_CONFIG))
}
+
+ class BackgroundConsumerSet(testGroupId: String, defaultConsumerConfig:
Properties) {
+ private val consumerSet:
scala.collection.mutable.Set[Consumer[Array[Byte], Array[Byte]]] =
scala.collection.mutable.Set.empty
+ private val consumerThreads: scala.collection.mutable.Set[Thread] =
scala.collection.mutable.Set.empty
+ private var startLatch: CountDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(0)
+ private var stopLatch: CountDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(0)
+ private var consumerThreadRunning = new AtomicBoolean(false)
+
+ defaultConsumerConfig.setProperty(ConsumerConfig.GROUP_ID_CONFIG,
testGroupId)
+
+ def addConsumer(topic: String, configOverrides: Properties = new
Properties()): Unit = {
+ val newConsumerConfig =
defaultConsumerConfig.clone().asInstanceOf[Properties]
+ newConsumerConfig.putAll(configOverrides)
+
+ val consumer = createConsumer(configOverrides = newConsumerConfig)
+ val consumerThread = createConsumerThread(consumer, topic)
+ consumerSet.add(consumer)
+ consumerThreads.add(consumerThread)
+ }
+
+ def start(): Unit = {
+ startLatch = new CountDownLatch(consumerSet.size)
+ stopLatch = new CountDownLatch(consumerSet.size)
+ consumerThreadRunning = new AtomicBoolean(true)
+ consumerThreads.foreach(_.start())
+ assertTrue(startLatch.await(30000, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS), "Failed to
start consumer threads in time")
+ }
+
+ def stop(): Unit = {
+ consumerThreadRunning.set(false)
Review Comment:
Done.
Note: I was wondering whether I should call `wakeup()` in the app thread or
in the consumer thread. However, it seems that adding it to app thread is the
correct approach, as the consumer thread might be blocked in `commitSync()`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
