AndrewJSchofield commented on code in PR #20811:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/20811#discussion_r2490374105
##########
storage/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/server/log/remote/metadata/storage/TopicBasedRemoteLogMetadataManagerConfig.java:
##########
@@ -46,13 +46,15 @@ public final class TopicBasedRemoteLogMetadataManagerConfig
{
public static final String
REMOTE_LOG_METADATA_TOPIC_REPLICATION_FACTOR_PROP =
"remote.log.metadata.topic.replication.factor";
public static final String REMOTE_LOG_METADATA_TOPIC_PARTITIONS_PROP =
"remote.log.metadata.topic.num.partitions";
public static final String REMOTE_LOG_METADATA_TOPIC_RETENTION_MS_PROP =
"remote.log.metadata.topic.retention.ms";
+ public static final String REMOTE_LOG_METADATA_TOPIC_MIN_ISR_PROP =
"remote.log.metadata.topic.min.isr";
Review Comment:
Yes, I think a separate tiny KIP for the internal topic question seems like
a good way to get the community to decide whether it's a good thing. Your PR
for it looks about right. Of course, we'd need the KIP to pass before taking
the PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
