[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18063551#comment-18063551
 ] 

Lucas Brutschy edited comment on KAFKA-20248 at 3/6/26 2:01 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

I will close this in favour of KAFKA-20116 and  KAFKA-20169 .

 

[~chickenchickenlove] / [~mjsax]: However, I think it would not be a bad idea 
to start sending the rackId sooner than later. [~mjsax] is planning to work on 
the HA assignor, but from my side there is not reason why not to start sending 
the rackId in 4.3 already. I just think this ticket may be a bit generic at 
this stage. We could create a subtask for KAFKA-20116  and do that now already.


was (Author: JIRAUSER302322):
I will close this in favour of KAFKA-20116 and  KAFKA-20169 .

> Support fields that are not yet supported in StreamsGroup.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-20248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20248
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: clients, streams
>            Reporter: sanghyeok An
>            Assignee: sanghyeok An
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: kip1071
>
> According to KIP-1071, the StreamsGroup protocol is required to support 
> various fields. However, at the client level, this is not fully implemented 
> yet.
> For example, as you can see in this code, KIP-1071 specifies that fields such 
> as {{rackId}} should be set when present, but they are not currently included 
> in the client request. {{rackId}} is an important factor in determining the 
> group epoch in the Streams protocol. 
> (https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/StreamsMembershipManager.java#L295-L310)
> Although these fields are explicitly defined in the KIP-1071 document, they 
> are not yet included in the actual client request. The goal of this ticket is 
> to support such fields that are defined in KIP-1071 but are still missing 
> from the client request.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to