[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew updated KAFKA-8315:
--------------------------
Description:
The documentation says to use `Materialized` not `JoinWindows.until()`
([https://kafka.apache.org/22/javadoc/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/JoinWindows.html#until-long-]),
but there is no where to pass a `Materialized` instance to the join operation,
only to the group operation is supported it seems.
Slack conversation here :
[https://confluentcommunity.slack.com/archives/C48AHTCUQ/p1556799561287300]
[Additional]
>From what I understand, the retention period should be independent of the
>grace period, so I think this is more than a documentation fix (see comments
>below)
was:
The documentation says to use `Materialized` not `JoinWindows.until()`
([https://kafka.apache.org/22/javadoc/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/JoinWindows.html#until-long-]),
but there is no where to pass a `Materialized` instance to the join operation,
only to the group operation is supported it seems.
Slack conversation here :
[https://confluentcommunity.slack.com/archives/C48AHTCUQ/p1556799561287300
]
[Additional]
>From what I understand, the retention period should be independent of the
>grace period, so I think this is more than a documentation fix (see comments
>below)
> Cannot pass Materialized into a join operation
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-8315
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8315
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Andrew
> Assignee: John Roesler
> Priority: Major
>
> The documentation says to use `Materialized` not `JoinWindows.until()`
> ([https://kafka.apache.org/22/javadoc/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/JoinWindows.html#until-long-]),
> but there is no where to pass a `Materialized` instance to the join
> operation, only to the group operation is supported it seems.
>
> Slack conversation here :
> [https://confluentcommunity.slack.com/archives/C48AHTCUQ/p1556799561287300]
> [Additional]
> From what I understand, the retention period should be independent of the
> grace period, so I think this is more than a documentation fix (see comments
> below)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
