[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18095996#comment-18095996
]
Alieh Saeedi commented on KAFKA-20399:
--------------------------------------
[~shekharrajak]
Design decision: It’s okay to keep the list values in a format where each value
includes its own header, for example: {{{}<key, val1 + headers, val2 +
headers>{}}}, and so on.
We’re planning to merge these PRs asap, so could you please undraft the PR,
rebase it, and address the review comments? It would be very helpful if you
could actively work on the PR over the next few days and keep making steady
progress each day until it is merged.
If you don’t expect to have enough time to work on it at that pace in the
coming days or weeks, please let us know so we can plan accordingly.
Thanks :)
> Implement VersionedKeyValueStoreWithHeaders
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-20399
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20399
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: streams
> Reporter: Matthias J. Sax
> Assignee: Shekhar Prasad Rajak
> Priority: Major
>
> While working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20173, we
> omitted all methods related to versioned-store – when we work on this ticker,
> we should revisit all version-store related serde code to ensure that headers
> are passed correclty.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
