varshini03 commented on code in PR #23236:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/23236#discussion_r3992567636
##########
tests/kafkatest/services/verifiable_producer.py:
##########
@@ -111,6 +113,26 @@ def __init__(self, context, num_nodes, kafka, topic,
max_messages=-1, throughput
def java_class_name(self):
return "VerifiableProducer"
+ def start(self, **kwargs):
+ super(VerifiableProducer, self).start(**kwargs)
+ timeout_sec = kwargs.get("timeout_sec", 120)
+ wait_until(
+ lambda: len(self.started_nodes()) == len(self.nodes) or
self._propagate_exceptions(),
+ timeout_sec=timeout_sec,
+ err_msg="Verifiable producer didn't finish startup in %d seconds"
% timeout_sec
+ )
+
+ def _handle_startup_complete(self, node):
+ """Called when a producer node emits the startup_complete event."""
+ with self.lock:
+ self._started_nodes_set.add(node)
Review Comment:
Thanks for the feedback! To address both,
The intent of started_nodes() is to track "nodes that have completed
startup", "currently running nodes".
I also noticed https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/23366/changes takes the
same semantic approach and seems to rename it to startup_complete_nodes for
clarity I believe. Happy to do the same rename here, let me know if that's
preferred then?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
