[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16931662#comment-16931662 ]
Gunnar Morling edited comment on KAFKA-8523 at 9/17/19 5:08 PM: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, I was arriving at pretty much the same conclusion; that said: is an option even needed: I've come to think that a tombstone should remain just that, a tombstone, i.e. I don't see a good reason to inject any value into a tombstone really; after all, it has specific semantics -- enabling compaction -- which shouldn't be altered. So I would suggest I simply update my PR so that it passes on tombstones unmodified and that should be good enought. WDYT? Note, if we wanted to have an option, I think it would allow to pass on tombstones unmodified (as suggested above) OR to insert the new field, i.e. there wouldn't be an empty map really returned, but a map with a single entry for that new field (so what the current PR is doing). This could be done, but as argued it'd change the message's nature of being a tombstone, so it's probably not desirable? was (Author: gunnar.morling): Yes, I was arriving at pretty much the same conclusion; that said: is an option even needed: I've come to think that a tombstone should remain just that, a tombstone, i.e. I don't see a good reason to inject any value into a tombstone really; after all, it has specific semantics -- enabling compaction -- which shouldn't be altered. So I would suggest I simply update my PR so that it passes on tombstones unmodified and that should be good enought. WDYT? > InsertField transformation fails when encountering tombstone event > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: KAFKA-8523 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8523 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Bug > Components: KafkaConnect > Reporter: Gunnar Morling > Priority: Major > > When applying the {{InsertField}} transformation to a tombstone event, an > exception is raised: > {code} > org.apache.kafka.connect.errors.DataException: Only Map objects supported in > absence of schema for [field insertion], found: null > at > org.apache.kafka.connect.transforms.util.Requirements.requireMap(Requirements.java:38) > at > org.apache.kafka.connect.transforms.InsertField.applySchemaless(InsertField.java:138) > at > org.apache.kafka.connect.transforms.InsertField.apply(InsertField.java:131) > at > org.apache.kafka.connect.transforms.InsertFieldTest.tombstone(InsertFieldTest.java:128) > {code} > AFAICS, the transform can still be made working in in this case by simply > building up a new value map from scratch. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003)