cadonna commented on a change in pull request #8902:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8902#discussion_r447567460



##########
File path: 
streams/src/test/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/state/internals/MeteredKeyValueStoreTest.java
##########
@@ -124,18 +141,19 @@ public void before() {
             Serdes.String()
         );
         metrics.config().recordLevel(Sensor.RecordingLevel.DEBUG);
-        expect(context.metrics())
-            .andReturn(new StreamsMetricsImpl(metrics, "test", 
builtInMetricsVersion)).anyTimes();
-        expect(context.taskId()).andReturn(taskId).anyTimes();
-        expect(inner.name()).andReturn("metered").anyTimes();
+        expect(context.applicationId()).andStubReturn(APPLICATION_ID);
+        expect(context.metrics()).andStubReturn(new 
StreamsMetricsImpl(metrics, "test", builtInMetricsVersion));
+        expect(context.taskId()).andStubReturn(taskId);
+        
expect(context.changelogFor(STORE_NAME)).andStubReturn(CHANGELOG_TOPIC);

Review comment:
       I agree that EasyMock is not able to magically implement a complex 
interface contract. However, as I said earlier it would significantly increase 
the size of this PR to swap to `InternalMockProcessorContext` or one of its 
siblings right now.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to