[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17160152#comment-17160152
]
Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-10284:
---------------------------------------
[~bchen225242] Thanks for the find. Just trying to clarify that "bring up the
zombie member ID" would break correctness, since if the zombie member still
exists, it may be able to commit offsets which would rewind the position. Is
that right?
> Group membership update due to static member rejoin should be persisted
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-10284
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10284
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: consumer
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0, 2.4.0, 2.5.0, 2.6.0
> Reporter: Boyang Chen
> Assignee: Boyang Chen
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.6.1
>
>
> For known static members rejoin, we would update its corresponding member.id
> without triggering a new rebalance. This serves the purpose for avoiding
> unnecessary rebalance for static membership, as well as fencing purpose if
> some still uses the old member.id.
> The bug is that we don't actually persist the membership update, so if no
> upcoming rebalance gets triggered, this new member.id information will get
> lost during group coordinator immigration, thus bringing up the zombie member
> identity.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
