[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17268915#comment-17268915
 ] 

Matthias J. Sax commented on KAFKA-10848:
-----------------------------------------

Thanks [~guozhang] – the idea of this ticket was along the same lines as your 
proposal. How we design the interface would be something to discuss on the KIP. 
Samza for example uses a quite different interface: 
[https://samza.apache.org/learn/documentation/0.7.0/api/javadocs/org/apache/samza/system/chooser/MessageChooser.html]
 – Don't know which API would be favorable.

> Allow fine grained control over cross-partition processing order
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-10848
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10848
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Matthias J. Sax
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: needs-kip
>
> Currently, KafkaStreams implements a hard-coded timestamp based strategy to 
> pick the next record to process for a task, given that a task has multiple 
> partitions.
> In general, this strategy works well for the DSL, but for PAPI users, there 
> might be cases when the strategy should be customized. And even for the DSL, 
> there is one corner case (for a stream-table join) for which the table-side 
> record should be processed first if two records have the same timestamp (at 
> least, this gap exists as long as we don't have multi-version KTables), while 
> we cannot enforce this behavior because at runtime we don't know anything 
> about KStream vs KTable or an existing downstream join.
> Thus, we might want to allow users to plugin a custom strategy to pick the 
> next record for processing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to