[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17299936#comment-17299936
 ] 

Justine Olshan commented on KAFKA-12457:
----------------------------------------

Thanks for creating this JIRA. There is some discussion on sentinel topic IDs 
in KIP-516 as well, but it has been a while since we discussed this. I think 
the original plan was to use the sentinel ID as a sort of bootstrap for Vote 
requests and then to generate a unique topic ID for the metadata topic. Very 
much open to discussion and potential changes though.
[https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-516%3A+Topic+Identifiers#KIP516:TopicIdentifiers-CompatibilitywithKIP-500]

 

> Implications of KIP-516 for quorum controller
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-12457
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12457
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: kip-500
>
> KIP-516 introduces topic IDs to Kafka. We are in the process of updating many 
> of the protocols to support them. In most cases, we are dropping the topic 
> name entirely from new API versions. I think there are two open questions for 
> KIP-500 in regard to this:
> 1. Can we assume topic ID existence in KIP-500? 
> I think the answer here is yes, and the existing code already assumes it. The 
> nice thing is that KIP-516 brings with it the logic to create topic IDs for 
> existing topics. We can rely on this ability in the bridge release to ensure 
> that all topics have topic IDs. And we can add it to pre-upgrade validations.
> 2. What topic ID should be used for `@metadata`? 
> There are basically two options for this: either use a sentinel topic ID or 
> let the controller generate a new one and write it into a `TopicRecord` when 
> the cluster first initializes. If we assume long term that we won't be able 
> to use topic names in the inter-broker protocol, then a sentinel might really 
> be a necessity since brokers would need to know the topic ID before they can 
> send fetches. In other words, if we generate a unique ID, then we probably 
> still need some sentinel so that followers can fetch the initial 
> `TopicRecord` which contains the ID.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to